How sophisticated investors are using activism to drive corporate change.
The future of shareholder activism is shaping corporate governance in profound ways as sophisticated investors increasingly use their influence to drive change. Traditionally viewed as a mechanism for unlocking shareholder value through aggressive restructuring or leadership changes, activism has evolved into a broader tool for corporate transformation. Investors are now focusing on a range of issues, from environmental and social concerns to capital allocation and executive accountability. This shift is being driven by an increasingly engaged investor base, regulatory changes, and the power of institutional shareholders.
The evolution of shareholder activism is evident in the way campaigns are structured. While activist investors historically targeted underperforming companies with financial inefficiencies, today’s activism extends to corporate strategy, sustainability and governance practices. Large institutional investors are increasingly vocal about corporate behavior and long-term value creation. These investors are demanding greater transparency, ethical business practices and a commitment to long-term shareholder returns. As a result, companies are finding themselves more accountable not only for their financial performance but also for their broader impact on society and the environment.
In the United States, shareholder activism has gained traction through high-profile campaigns led by hedge funds and institutional investors. One notable example is the campaign by activist hedge fund Engine No. 1 against ExxonMobil. The small but influential investor successfully secured board seats at the oil giant, pushing for a transition toward more sustainable energy practices. The campaign highlighted how even a relatively small shareholder could exert significant influence when rallying institutional investors behind a cause. This marked a turning point in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) activism, demonstrating that sophisticated investors could use their stake to drive strategic corporate change beyond short-term financial gains.
The trend towards ESG-focused activism has also reached Australian markets. Some of the country’s largest superannuation funds have been increasingly vocal in challenging corporate boards on issues such as climate change and governance. They use their voting power to push for improved sustainability commitments from major listed companies. Another example is AGL Energy, one of Australia’s largest power companies, which has faced intense activist pressure to accelerate its transition away from coal. In 2022, billionaire investor Mike Cannon-Brookes led a shareholder revolt against AGL’s demerger plans, arguing that the company needed to commit to a faster shift towards renewable energy. His intervention ultimately forced the company to reconsider its strategy, demonstrating the growing power of sophisticated investors in influencing corporate direction.
Beyond ESG concerns, shareholder activism in Australia has also targeted corporate governance and capital allocation. The case of BHP’s dual-listed structure is an example of how shareholder pressure can drive strategic change. In 2021, investors pushed BHP to unify its corporate structure to improve efficiency and eliminate complexities that had been weighing on its valuation. The move was ultimately implemented, showcasing how shareholder activism can lead to significant corporate restructuring in response to investor demands.
Activist campaigns are not always adversarial and many investors are now engaging in constructive dialogue with management teams to drive change. Collaborative activism, where investors work alongside company leadership rather than against it, is becoming more prevalent. This approach often yields better outcomes, as companies are more willing to make strategic adjustments when engagement is framed as a partnership rather than a hostile takeover attempt. Institutional investors have increasingly adopted this model, leveraging their vast shareholdings to push for governance improvements without resorting to public battles.
The future of shareholder activism will likely be shaped by regulatory changes that empower investors further. In Australia, the introduction of mandatory climate risk disclosures and the increasing emphasis on ESG reporting are giving investors more tools to hold companies accountable. Shareholder voting on executive remuneration has also gained momentum, ensuring that corporate leadership is more directly answerable to investors.As these regulatory frameworks evolve, companies will need to be more proactive in addressing shareholder concerns to avoid contentious activist campaigns.
Technology is also playing a key role in the evolution of shareholder activism. Digital platforms and social media have given retail investors a greater voice in corporate governance, enabling grassroots activism to influence boardroom decisions. Platforms such as X (Twitter), LinkedIn and investor forums allow activists to build momentum and mobilize support in ways that were previously impossible. Crowdsourced activism, where retail investors band together to challenge corporate policies, is also growing, particularly in markets with high retail participation.
The rise of private equity and alternative investment firms as activist players is another trend shaping the landscape. Unlike traditional activist hedge funds that seek quick financial gains, private equity firms often take a long-term approach, influencing companies from within. This trend is particularly relevant in Australia, where private equity has been increasingly active in reshaping underperforming businesses. Firms such as Pacific Equity Partners have been involved in strategic overhauls of Australian companies, demonstrating that activism is not confined to public markets but is also influencing private sector investments.
As shareholder activism continues to evolve, companies must adapt to this changing environment by being more responsive to investor concerns. Proactive engagement, improved transparency and a clear strategic vision will be essential for companies looking to navigate the increasing influence of activist investors. The days of dismissing shareholder activists as disruptive outsiders are over. Today’s activism is driven by sophisticated investors who seek to create lasting value, not just for themselves but for all stakeholders.
Looking ahead, the role of shareholder activism in corporate governance will only grow stronger. Investors will continue to leverage their influence to push for change, particularly in areas such as climate action, corporate governance and capital efficiency. As activism becomes more integrated into mainstream investment strategies, companies that embrace constructive engagement and align with investor expectations will be best positioned for long-term success. The future of shareholder activism is one where investors and companies engage in a more dynamic and strategic dialogue, shaping the direction of corporate governance for years to come.
PrimaryMarkets
For companies and managed funds that are not listed on a stock exchange, the PrimaryMarkets trading Platform is an ideal way to facilitate the off-market sale of shares in your company and units in managed funds.
PrimaryMarkets is a flexible and evolving Platform that responds in real time to an ever-changing investment environment. In doing so, it provides sophisticated investors with access to companies that are shaping the future in a wide variety of industries and sectors. We provide access to opportunities previously only accessible to institutional investors. In addition to trading, PrimaryMarkets helps companies raise capital from our global investor database.
PrimaryMarkets exemplifies how innovation can transform the way we invest, trade and raise capital by breaking down traditional barriers, providing liquidity solutions and promoting transparency.
As the Platform continues to grow and evolve, it promises to unlock even more opportunities for investors and companies shaping the future of economies.